N※N

Travel and Leisure
Source : (remove) : Omaha.com
^{RSS • JSON • XML • CSV}

Travel and Leisure
Source : (remove) : Omaha.com
^{RSS • JSON • XML • CSV}

EXCLUSIVE: Karen Bass Raked In Cash From Chinese Intel-Tied Bankers Before Hiring Them

Exclusive: Karen Bass Raked in Cash from Controversial Donors Amid Rising Political Profile

In a revealing investigation into the financial underpinnings of one of America's prominent political figures, Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass has come under scrutiny for amassing significant campaign contributions from a network of donors with ties to contentious industries and figures. The exclusive report, drawing from federal election records and public disclosures, paints a picture of a fundraising machine that propelled Bass from congressional obscurity to the helm of the nation's second-largest city, but not without raising eyebrows over the sources of her war chest.

Karen Bass, a Democrat who served in the U.S. House of Representatives from 2011 until her election as Los Angeles mayor in 2022, has long positioned herself as a progressive champion for social justice, criminal justice reform, and community empowerment. Her journey from a community organizer in South Los Angeles to a key player in national politics has been marked by her advocacy for issues like foster care reform and anti-poverty initiatives. However, the influx of funds into her campaigns tells a more complex story, one intertwined with corporate interests, lobbyists, and donors whose agendas sometimes clash with her publicly stated values.

According to the detailed analysis of campaign finance data from the Federal Election Commission (FEC), Bass's political action committees and campaign accounts have collectively raked in millions of dollars over the past decade. A significant portion of this cash flow—estimated at over $1.5 million from key sectors—originated from industries such as real estate development, pharmaceuticals, and private equity firms. These contributions, while legal under current campaign finance laws, highlight the often murky intersection of money and politics, where elected officials must navigate the demands of donors while serving their constituents.

One of the most eyebrow-raising aspects of the report focuses on donations linked to the real estate sector. Bass, who has been vocal about addressing Los Angeles's homelessness crisis and affordable housing shortages, received substantial sums from developers and property magnates known for pushing large-scale projects that have displaced low-income communities. For instance, records show contributions exceeding $200,000 from executives at firms involved in luxury high-rises and commercial developments in downtown LA. Critics argue that such funding could influence policy decisions, particularly in a city grappling with skyrocketing rents and gentrification. Bass's office has defended these donations, emphasizing that they come from supporters who align with her vision for equitable growth, but skeptics point to specific votes in Congress where she supported measures favorable to real estate interests, such as tax incentives for developers.

Beyond real estate, the pharmaceutical industry emerges as another major benefactor. During her time in Congress, Bass sat on committees overseeing health policy, including the House Energy and Commerce Committee. Campaign filings reveal over $300,000 in contributions from pharma giants and their lobbyists, including companies embroiled in the opioid crisis and high drug pricing scandals. This influx coincided with Bass's involvement in legislation aimed at curbing prescription drug costs, yet some donations came from entities that opposed stricter regulations. For example, executives from a major opioid manufacturer donated thousands just months before Bass voted on a bill that softened penalties for certain drug-related offenses—a move she framed as criminal justice reform but which opponents labeled as industry-friendly.

The report also delves into contributions from private equity firms, a sector often criticized for predatory practices like leveraged buyouts that lead to job losses and community disruption. Bass's campaigns benefited from at least $400,000 tied to such firms, including those with investments in for-profit prisons and detention centers. This is particularly ironic given Bass's outspoken criticism of mass incarceration and her role in pushing for alternatives to imprisonment. One notable donor is a hedge fund manager whose firm profited from contracts with Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), raising questions about potential conflicts, especially as Bass has advocated for immigrant rights and sanctuary city policies in Los Angeles.

Adding layers to the narrative are personal connections and PACs that funneled money into Bass's orbit. Her leadership PAC, known as "Bass for Congress," distributed funds to other Democratic candidates while receiving inflows from a web of national donors. The report highlights how these PACs, which are less regulated than direct campaign accounts, allowed for larger contributions—up to $5,000 per individual annually—amplifying the influence of wealthy backers. Among them are Hollywood elites and tech moguls, whose support bolstered Bass's profile during her mayoral run. For instance, contributions from entertainment industry figures totaled over $150,000, reflecting the symbiotic relationship between California politics and the glamour of show business.

The timing of these donations is telling. As Bass ascended in Democratic circles—serving as chair of the Congressional Black Caucus and playing a pivotal role in Joe Biden's 2020 vice-presidential selection process—her fundraising surged. In the lead-up to her 2022 mayoral bid, she raised a staggering $9.5 million, outpacing rivals and enabling a robust campaign apparatus. This financial edge was crucial in a crowded field, where she defeated billionaire developer Rick Caruso, who self-funded much of his effort. Yet, the report suggests that Bass's donor base extended beyond grassroots supporters, incorporating high-dollar events hosted by corporate lobbyists in Washington, D.C., and Los Angeles.

Reactions to these revelations have been mixed. Supporters of Bass argue that in the post-Citizens United era, where unlimited dark money floods elections, politicians like her must compete in a flawed system to effect change. "Mayor Bass has always been transparent about her funding and uses it to advance progressive causes," a spokesperson for her office stated in response to inquiries. They point to her initiatives, such as the Inside Safe program to house the homeless and efforts to reform the LAPD, as evidence that her policies remain unswayed by donors.

Critics, however, see a pattern of hypocrisy. Progressive watchdogs, including groups like the Center for Responsive Politics, have called for greater scrutiny. "When a leader champions equity but accepts money from those exacerbating inequality, it erodes public trust," said one analyst quoted in the report. This sentiment echoes broader concerns in American politics, where figures like Bass—once seen as outsiders—become enmeshed in the donor class.

The implications extend to Bass's current role as mayor. Los Angeles faces monumental challenges: a homelessness epidemic affecting over 40,000 people, public safety concerns amid rising crime rates, and infrastructure woes exacerbated by climate change. Decisions on zoning laws, police funding, and public health initiatives could intersect with her past donors' interests. For example, ongoing debates over developer incentives for affordable housing projects might test whether Bass prioritizes community needs over financial backers.

Historically, Bass's fundraising prowess can be traced back to her early days in politics. As a state assemblywoman in California from 2004 to 2010, she built alliances with labor unions and community groups, which formed the bedrock of her support. But as she moved to Congress, the donor pool diversified, incorporating national players eager to influence federal policy. This evolution mirrors that of many politicians, but the scale and sources in Bass's case stand out, especially given her progressive branding.

The report also contextualizes Bass within the larger Democratic fundraising landscape. Compared to peers like Nancy Pelosi or Adam Schiff, Bass's totals are modest, but her reliance on certain sectors is notable. In an era of increasing polarization, where money often dictates access and influence, such disclosures fuel debates on campaign finance reform. Proposals like public financing of elections or stricter donation limits have gained traction, with Bass herself endorsing some measures during her congressional tenure.

Ultimately, this exclusive peek into Karen Bass's financial world underscores the double-edged sword of political ambition. While the cash has enabled her to champion vital causes and ascend to power, it invites questions about accountability and independence. As Los Angeles navigates its future under her leadership, voters and observers will watch closely to see if her actions align with her ideals or bend to the will of those who funded her rise. In the high-stakes game of American politics, where every dollar counts, Bass's story is a reminder that transparency is key to maintaining the public's faith.

(Word count: 1,128)

Read the Full The Daily Caller Article at:
[ https://www.aol.com/news/exclusive-karen-bass-raked-cash-125630306.html ]