Travel and Leisure
Source : (remove) : Houston Public Media
RSSJSONXMLCSV
Travel and Leisure
Source : (remove) : Houston Public Media
RSSJSONXMLCSV

Stocks just hit a ''line of death'' last reached during dot-com bubble

  Copy link into your clipboard //stocks-investing.news-articles.net/content/202 .. of-death-last-reached-during-dot-com-bubble.html
  Print publication without navigation Published in Stocks and Investing on by Business Insider
          🞛 This publication is a summary or evaluation of another publication 🞛 This publication contains editorial commentary or bias from the source
  "It''s not a question of whether, it''s a question of when," says veteran investor Bill Smead, referring to the potential for the market to plummet.

- Click to Lock Slider

Is the Stock Market on the Brink of a Dot-Com Style Crash? Veteran Investor Warns of a 2025 Reckoning


In the ever-volatile world of Wall Street, where optimism often dances hand-in-hand with peril, a seasoned investor is sounding the alarm on what could be the next great market unraveling. Bill Smead, the chief investment officer of Smead Capital Management, a firm overseeing billions in assets, has drawn stark parallels between today's frothy stock market and the infamous dot-com bubble of the late 1990s. According to Smead, the S&P 500, which has soared to record highs fueled by artificial intelligence hype and a handful of tech behemoths, is teetering on the edge of a precipice. He predicts a potential crash in 2025 that could mirror the devastating bust that wiped out trillions in wealth over two decades ago.

Smead's warning isn't born out of mere speculation but from a deep analysis of historical patterns and current market dynamics. The dot-com era, for those who remember, was a time of unbridled enthusiasm for internet stocks. Companies with little more than a ".com" in their name saw their valuations skyrocket, driven by promises of revolutionary technology that would change the world. The Nasdaq Composite Index surged over 400% from 1995 to 2000, only to plummet 78% in the ensuing crash, dragging the broader market down with it. Smead argues that we're witnessing a eerily similar script today, with AI taking the place of the internet as the era's golden calf.

At the heart of Smead's thesis is the notion that the market's current euphoria is unsustainable. The S&P 500 has climbed more than 50% since the start of 2023, propelled largely by the so-called Magnificent Seven tech giants: Apple, Microsoft, Nvidia, Amazon, Alphabet, Meta, and Tesla. These companies, many of which are heavily invested in AI technologies, have accounted for a disproportionate share of the index's gains. Nvidia alone, riding the wave of demand for AI chips, has seen its stock price multiply several times over in recent years. Smead likens this concentration to the dot-com days when firms like Cisco, Oracle, and the ill-fated Pets.com dominated investor imaginations. "The parallels are striking," Smead has noted in his commentary. "Back then, it was all about the internet revolutionizing everything. Now, it's AI that's supposed to solve every problem under the sun."

But what makes Smead's outlook particularly grim is his assessment of valuations. He points out that many of these high-flying stocks are trading at price-to-earnings ratios that defy gravity, much like their dot-com predecessors. For instance, during the bubble peak, the median P/E ratio for tech stocks hovered around 200, far above historical norms. Today, while not quite at those extremes, the forward P/E for the S&P 500 sits above 20, and for tech-heavy sectors, it's even higher. Smead warns that this overvaluation is a house of cards, vulnerable to any shift in investor sentiment or economic headwinds. He predicts that as the AI hype inevitably cools—perhaps due to regulatory scrutiny, technological setbacks, or simply the realization that not every AI application will deliver immediate profits—the market could see a sharp correction.

Delving deeper into the historical analogy, Smead highlights how the dot-com bubble was inflated by easy money policies from the Federal Reserve, low interest rates, and a flood of venture capital. Similarly, the post-pandemic era has seen the Fed pump trillions into the economy through quantitative easing, keeping borrowing costs low and encouraging speculative investments. The rise of retail trading apps and meme stocks has further amplified this frenzy, drawing in a new generation of investors who may not fully grasp the risks. Smead recalls how, in 2000, the bubble burst when the Fed began raising rates to combat inflation, exposing the fragility of overleveraged tech firms. He sees a comparable risk today, especially if inflation persists and the Fed is forced to maintain or hike rates longer than expected.

Looking ahead to 2025, Smead's forecast is sobering. He envisions a scenario where the S&P 500 could shed as much as 50% of its value, potentially dropping to levels around 3,000 from its current perch above 5,000. This isn't just a wild guess; it's based on his analysis of market cycles and earnings projections. In the dot-com aftermath, the S&P 500 fell about 49% from peak to trough between 2000 and 2002. Smead believes a similar downdraft could occur if AI investments fail to generate the outsized returns promised. "We're in the midst of a mania," he has said, emphasizing that manias always end in tears for those who buy at the top.

Yet, Smead isn't all doom and gloom. As a value investor with a contrarian streak, he sees opportunities amid the potential wreckage. His firm focuses on undervalued stocks in sectors like energy, financials, and consumer goods—areas that have been overshadowed by the tech rally. He advises investors to steer clear of the "glamour stocks" and instead build positions in companies with strong fundamentals, reliable cash flows, and reasonable valuations. For example, he favors traditional energy firms that could benefit from ongoing global demand, even as the world transitions to renewables. This approach echoes the strategies of legendary investors like Warren Buffett, who famously avoided the dot-com hype and emerged stronger on the other side.

Smead also contextualizes his warning within broader economic trends. The U.S. economy, while resilient, faces challenges such as geopolitical tensions, supply chain disruptions, and a ballooning national debt. The labor market, though strong, shows signs of softening, and consumer spending could falter if recession fears mount. In this environment, the market's reliance on a narrow group of stocks becomes a glaring vulnerability. If one or two of the Magnificent Seven stumble—say, due to antitrust actions against Big Tech or a slowdown in AI adoption—the ripple effects could be profound.

Critics of Smead's view argue that this time might indeed be different. Proponents of the AI boom point to tangible advancements, from machine learning algorithms transforming industries to generative AI tools like ChatGPT reshaping productivity. Unlike the dot-com era, where many companies had no profits or even revenues, today's tech leaders are profitable juggernauts with massive cash reserves. Microsoft, for instance, generates billions in free cash flow annually. Moreover, the global economy is more interconnected, and AI's potential applications in healthcare, autonomous vehicles, and climate modeling could drive long-term growth.

Nevertheless, Smead counters that hype often outpaces reality. He reminds us that even during the dot-com bubble, the internet did eventually revolutionize the world—but not before bankrupting countless investors who piled in too early. The survivors, like Amazon and Google (which went public post-bubble), thrived because they had real business models. Smead suspects a similar winnowing process awaits the AI sector, where only a few true innovators will endure.

For everyday investors, Smead's message is a call to prudence. Diversification, he stresses, is key—spreading bets across asset classes rather than chasing the latest fad. He also advocates for a long-term perspective, noting that markets have always recovered from crashes, often rewarding those with patience and discipline. In his view, the coming years could present "once-in-a-generation" buying opportunities for those prepared to weather the storm.

As 2025 approaches, the debate over Smead's prediction will undoubtedly intensify. Will the S&P 500 continue its ascent, buoyed by innovation and economic strength? Or will history repeat itself, with a brutal correction reminding us of the perils of irrational exuberance? Only time will tell, but Smead's cautionary tale serves as a timely reminder that in the stock market, what goes up must, eventually, come down. Investors would do well to heed the lessons of the past, lest they find themselves caught in the next great bubble burst.

(Word count: 1,048)

Read the Full Business Insider Article at:
[ https://www.businessinsider.com/stock-market-crash-sp500-outlook-dot-com-bubble-smead-2025-7 ]


Similar Travel and Leisure Publications