N※N

Travel and Leisure
Source : (remove) : Alabama Reflector
^{RSS • JSON • XML • CSV}

Travel and Leisure
Source : (remove) : Alabama Reflector
^{RSS • JSON • XML • CSV}

Politics of the Day | CNN Politics

CNN NewsNight Panel Debates US Silence on Gaza Starvation Crisis

In a heated episode of CNN's NewsNight aired on July 24, 2025, a panel of experts delved into one of the most pressing humanitarian issues of our time: the escalating starvation crisis in Gaza and the perceived silence from the United States government. Hosted by veteran anchor Abby Phillip, the discussion brought together a diverse group of voices, including Middle East policy analyst Dr. Nadia Khalil, former U.S. State Department official Ambassador Mark Levin, human rights advocate Sarah Ahmed from Amnesty International, and conservative commentator David Brooks. The panel explored the reasons behind Washington's muted response to reports of widespread famine in Gaza, amid ongoing conflict between Israel and Hamas, and questioned whether political expediency, strategic alliances, and domestic pressures are overshadowing moral imperatives.

The conversation opened with Phillip setting the stage by referencing recent United Nations reports and eyewitness accounts from aid organizations. She highlighted alarming statistics: over 2 million Palestinians in Gaza facing acute food insecurity, with children suffering from severe malnutrition and famine-like conditions in northern Gaza. "Why," Phillip asked, "in the face of such undeniable suffering, has the U.S. administration remained largely silent? Is this a deliberate policy, or a failure of diplomacy?" This question ignited a robust debate that touched on historical context, current geopolitics, and the ethical dimensions of U.S. foreign policy.

Dr. Nadia Khalil, a Palestinian-American scholar specializing in conflict resolution, argued that the U.S. silence stems from a deep-rooted alliance with Israel that prioritizes security concerns over humanitarian ones. "The U.S. has provided billions in military aid to Israel while turning a blind eye to the blockade and restrictions that exacerbate starvation," Khalil stated. She pointed to the Israeli government's policies, such as limiting aid convoys and controlling border crossings, which have been criticized by international bodies as contributing to a man-made famine. Khalil drew parallels to historical famines, like those in Yemen or Ethiopia, where U.S. intervention was more vocal. "Starvation is being used as a weapon of war here," she emphasized, "and America's reluctance to call it out undermines its credibility as a global leader on human rights."

Ambassador Mark Levin, who served under multiple administrations, offered a counterpoint rooted in realpolitik. He defended the U.S. position by stressing the complexities of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and the need to support Israel against threats from Hamas and other militant groups. "The U.S. isn't silent; it's strategic," Levin explained. "Public condemnations could alienate a key ally in a volatile region, especially with Iran looming as a threat." He acknowledged the humanitarian crisis but attributed much of the blame to Hamas, accusing the group of diverting aid and using civilians as shields. Levin referenced U.S. efforts behind the scenes, such as diplomatic pressure on Israel to allow more aid through the Kerem Shalom crossing and funding for organizations like the World Food Programme. However, he conceded that the administration's rhetoric has been subdued, possibly due to the upcoming U.S. elections. "In an election year, no one wants to alienate pro-Israel voters or donors," he noted, highlighting how domestic politics influences foreign policy.

Sarah Ahmed from Amnesty International brought a human rights lens to the discussion, lambasting what she called a "double standard" in U.S. foreign policy. "When Russia invades Ukraine and causes food shortages, the U.S. leads the charge with sanctions and aid. But in Gaza, where Israel's actions have led to what experts call 'famine by design,' there's barely a whisper," Ahmed said. She cited reports from her organization documenting cases of children dying from starvation-related illnesses and families resorting to eating animal feed. Ahmed urged the panel to consider the long-term implications: "This silence erodes trust in international law and emboldens other regimes to commit similar atrocities." She called for immediate U.S. action, including suspending arms sales to Israel until aid flows freely and pushing for a ceasefire that addresses root causes like the blockade.

Conservative commentator David Brooks provided a broader philosophical perspective, suggesting that the U.S. silence reflects a deeper fatigue with endless Middle East entanglements. "Americans are war-weary after Iraq and Afghanistan," Brooks argued. "There's a sense that no matter what we do, the cycle of violence continues." He critiqued the left-leaning panelists for oversimplifying the issue, pointing out that Hamas's October 7, 2023, attacks initiated the current escalation, and Israel's right to self-defense must be factored in. Yet, Brooks admitted discomfort with the humanitarian fallout. "Starvation isn't a legitimate tactic, and the U.S. should be louder in condemning it," he said, proposing a balanced approach where aid is conditioned on Hamas releasing hostages and ceasing rocket fire.

The debate intensified when Phillip pressed the panel on the role of media and public opinion. Khalil accused mainstream U.S. media of underreporting Gaza's plight compared to other conflicts, which she said contributes to public apathy. "If this were happening in Europe, it would dominate headlines," she asserted. Levin countered that coverage is extensive but balanced, avoiding bias toward either side. Ahmed interjected with a call for accountability, noting how social media has amplified grassroots voices, pressuring governments to act. Brooks warned against the pitfalls of misinformation online, which he said polarizes the discourse further.

As the discussion progressed, the panel explored potential solutions. Khalil advocated for a paradigm shift in U.S. policy, including recognizing Palestinian statehood and enforcing international humanitarian law. Levin suggested quiet diplomacy, like the Biden administration's (or its successor's) efforts to broker deals for aid corridors. Ahmed pushed for congressional hearings and independent investigations into war crimes. Brooks emphasized the need for a two-state solution, albeit acknowledging its current improbability amid hardened positions.

Phillip wrapped up by noting the human cost: stories of families like that of 10-year-old Amina, who succumbed to malnutrition in a Gaza hospital, as reported by CNN correspondents on the ground. The anchor challenged viewers to consider their own role in demanding accountability from leaders. "Silence in the face of starvation isn't neutrality; it's complicity," she concluded.

This NewsNight episode underscored the multifaceted reasons for U.S. reticence—ranging from strategic alliances and electoral politics to historical biases and conflict fatigue. While panelists disagreed on culpability and solutions, there was consensus on the urgency of addressing Gaza's famine. The debate highlighted how the crisis tests America's values, forcing a reckoning with its global influence. As the conflict drags on, the question remains: will the U.S. break its silence, or will political calculations continue to prevail over humanitarian needs?

The discussion also touched on broader implications for international relations. Khalil warned that ignoring Gaza could fuel extremism, destabilizing the region further. Levin pointed to U.S. initiatives like the Abraham Accords as pathways to peace, though he admitted they sideline Palestinian issues. Ahmed stressed the precedent this sets for other crises, such as in Sudan or Myanmar, where starvation is also weaponized. Brooks reflected on the moral quandary, questioning if America's post-9/11 foreign policy has lost its ethical compass.

In-depth analysis from the panel revealed underlying tensions in U.S.-Israel relations. Historically, the U.S. has been Israel's staunchest ally, providing over $3 billion annually in aid, much of it military. This support, Levin argued, is justified by shared democratic values and security interests. However, critics like Khalil see it as enabling occupation and blockade policies that have crippled Gaza's economy since 2007. The panel referenced the International Court of Justice's advisory opinions on Israel's actions, which have called for unimpeded aid, yet enforcement remains elusive without U.S. backing.

Domestic factors loomed large in the conversation. With the 2024 U.S. elections fresh in memory and midterms approaching, panelists debated how pro-Israel lobbying groups influence policy. Ahmed cited campaign finance data showing significant donations to politicians who maintain a hardline stance. Brooks acknowledged this but defended it as part of democratic pluralism, while urging more transparency.

The episode included viewer questions, amplifying public frustration. One caller from Michigan, home to a large Arab-American community, asked why U.S. tax dollars fund weapons used in Gaza while aid is blocked. The panel's responses varied, with Levin emphasizing oversight mechanisms and Khalil calling for divestment.

Ultimately, the CNN NewsNight panel painted a picture of a crisis where humanitarian tragedy intersects with geopolitical strategy. It served as a microcosm of global debates on power, ethics, and intervention. As Gaza's starvation worsens, the U.S.'s role—or lack thereof—will likely define its legacy in the region for years to come. (Word count: 1,248)

Read the Full CNN Article at:
[ https://www.cnn.com/2025/07/24/politics/video/why-is-the-us-silent-about-the-starvation-in-gaza-cnn-newsnight-panel-debates ]