N※N

DHS Reviews Minneapolis Shooting Amid Protest Scrutiny

  //travel-leisure.news-articles.net/content/2026/ .. -minneapolis-shooting-amid-protest-scrutiny.html
  Published in Travel and Leisure on Saturday, January 31st 2026 at 6:28 GMT by KTNV Las Vegas
      Locales: Minnesota, UNITED STATES

MINNEAPOLIS, MN - January 31st, 2026 - The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) is currently undertaking a comprehensive review of body camera footage and other evidence stemming from a shooting incident that occurred during a protest near the Hennepin County Courthouse in Minneapolis last July. The shooting, involving a U.S. Marshals Service officer and a civilian identified as Justus Johnson, continues to draw intense scrutiny and fuel demands for greater transparency in the use of federal law enforcement during civil unrest.

The incident, which took place amidst ongoing protests related to racial justice and police accountability - a common occurrence in the city following the 2020 death of George Floyd - has sparked a parallel investigation by the Minnesota Attorney General's Office. The dual investigations represent a significant effort to establish a clear understanding of the events that unfolded and determine whether appropriate protocols were followed by federal officers.

According to officials, the DHS review is specifically focused on assessing the actions of the U.S. Marshals Service officer involved, examining adherence to established use-of-force policies, and identifying any potential systemic failures that may have contributed to the shooting. The scope of the review extends beyond the immediate moments of the incident to include a broader evaluation of the federal law enforcement presence at the protest and the overall strategy employed to manage the situation.

Justus Johnson's family maintains that he was attempting to disengage from the protest and move away from the escalating tensions when he was struck by multiple gunshots. They have publicly questioned the necessity of the use of force and demanded full accountability from the officer involved. Their legal team has repeatedly called for the immediate release of the unedited body camera footage, arguing that it will provide crucial evidence clarifying the circumstances surrounding the shooting.

Authorities, however, have been cautious in releasing the footage, citing the ongoing investigations and the need to protect the integrity of the process. They have stated that the footage will be released at the appropriate time, once the investigations are complete and any potential legal proceedings have been initiated.

This incident highlights a growing national debate over the role of federal law enforcement in responding to local protests. Critics argue that the deployment of federal officers can often escalate tensions and contribute to a climate of fear and distrust, particularly within communities already marginalized and disproportionately impacted by law enforcement actions. They point to similar incidents in Portland, Oregon, and other cities as evidence of a pattern of overreach and aggressive tactics.

Furthermore, the case raises important questions about the training and de-escalation techniques employed by federal officers, particularly when operating in highly charged and emotionally sensitive environments. Advocates for police reform are calling for increased investment in non-lethal methods of crowd control and a greater emphasis on communication and conflict resolution.

Legal experts anticipate that the DHS review and the Attorney General's investigation will likely focus on several key factors, including: the justification for the use of deadly force, the officer's adherence to departmental policies, the proportionality of the response to the perceived threat, and whether the officer attempted to use less-lethal alternatives before resorting to gunfire. The review will also assess the overall coordination between different law enforcement agencies present at the protest.

The outcome of these investigations could have significant implications for future federal law enforcement deployments to protests, potentially leading to changes in training protocols, use-of-force policies, and oversight mechanisms. For the Johnson family, and for many others across the country, the pursuit of justice and accountability in this case represents a critical step towards building a more equitable and transparent system of law enforcement.