
[ Today @ 06:06 PM ]: Forbes
[ Today @ 03:06 PM ]: Forbes
[ Today @ 02:46 PM ]: Forbes
[ Today @ 01:46 PM ]: BBC
[ Today @ 11:46 AM ]: Forbes
[ Today @ 10:46 AM ]: Euronews
[ Today @ 10:27 AM ]: Fortune
[ Today @ 09:46 AM ]: MLive
[ Today @ 09:06 AM ]: Forbes
[ Today @ 07:29 AM ]: WDIO
[ Today @ 07:28 AM ]: Dexerto
[ Today @ 07:26 AM ]: Talksport
[ Today @ 06:07 AM ]: VideoGamer
[ Today @ 06:06 AM ]: KITV
[ Today @ 05:06 AM ]: Forbes
[ Today @ 03:26 AM ]: BBC
[ Today @ 02:46 AM ]: BBC
[ Today @ 01:46 AM ]: BBC
[ Today @ 12:28 AM ]: Hubert Carizone

[ Yesterday Evening ]: WDSU
[ Yesterday Afternoon ]: IndieWire
[ Yesterday Afternoon ]: WCAX3
[ Yesterday Afternoon ]: stacker
[ Yesterday Afternoon ]: WPXI
[ Yesterday Afternoon ]: CNET
[ Yesterday Afternoon ]: BBC
[ Yesterday Morning ]: Newsweek
[ Yesterday Morning ]: Forbes
[ Yesterday Morning ]: BBC
[ Yesterday Morning ]: Newsweek
[ Yesterday Morning ]: KTBS
[ Yesterday Morning ]: Newsweek
[ Yesterday Morning ]: CNN
[ Yesterday Morning ]: BBC
[ Yesterday Morning ]: Parade

[ Last Tuesday ]: inforum
[ Last Tuesday ]: PBS
[ Last Tuesday ]: CNET
[ Last Tuesday ]: Newsweek
[ Last Tuesday ]: WPBF
[ Last Tuesday ]: theinventory
[ Last Tuesday ]: Forbes
[ Last Tuesday ]: CNBC
[ Last Tuesday ]: CNN
[ Last Tuesday ]: WSAZ
[ Last Tuesday ]: Newsweek
[ Last Tuesday ]: CNET
[ Last Tuesday ]: Variety
[ Last Tuesday ]: Out
[ Last Tuesday ]: Forbes
[ Last Tuesday ]: MarketWatch
[ Last Tuesday ]: AFP
[ Last Tuesday ]: ABC

[ Last Monday ]: ClutchPoints
[ Last Monday ]: People
[ Last Monday ]: abc7NY
[ Last Monday ]: Lifewire
[ Last Monday ]: KARK
[ Last Monday ]: MassLive
[ Last Monday ]: NextShark
[ Last Monday ]: Newsweek
[ Last Monday ]: PBS
[ Last Monday ]: Investopedia
[ Last Monday ]: CNN
[ Last Monday ]: Newsweek
[ Last Monday ]: ThePrint
[ Last Monday ]: BBC
[ Last Monday ]: Newsweek
[ Last Monday ]: WPBF
[ Last Monday ]: Fortune
[ Last Monday ]: Forbes
[ Last Monday ]: CNET
[ Last Monday ]: Investopedia

[ Last Sunday ]: Jerry
[ Last Sunday ]: ESPN
[ Last Sunday ]: WJHG
[ Last Sunday ]: ESPN
[ Last Sunday ]: Cubby
[ Last Sunday ]: People
[ Last Sunday ]: ESPN
[ Last Sunday ]: Newsweek
[ Last Sunday ]: BuzzFeed

[ Last Saturday ]: Patch
[ Last Saturday ]: Newsweek
[ Last Saturday ]: Newsweek
[ Last Saturday ]: Hubert Carizone

[ Last Friday ]: AFP
[ Last Friday ]: stacker
[ Last Friday ]: ABC
[ Last Friday ]: Forbes
[ Last Friday ]: Investopedia
[ Last Friday ]: Reuters
[ Last Friday ]: WESH
[ Last Friday ]: MLive
[ Last Friday ]: MLB
[ Last Friday ]: BBC
[ Last Friday ]: Forbes
[ Last Friday ]: BBC
[ Last Friday ]: Upper
[ Last Friday ]: BBC
[ Last Friday ]: Vox
[ Last Friday ]: LancasterOnline
[ Last Friday ]: Fortune

[ Last Thursday ]: AFP
[ Thu, Jun 19th ]: ESPN
[ Thu, Jun 19th ]: ESPN
[ Thu, Jun 19th ]: BBC
[ Thu, Jun 19th ]: Delish
[ Thu, Jun 19th ]: MLive
[ Thu, Jun 19th ]: ESPN
[ Thu, Jun 19th ]: Forbes
[ Thu, Jun 19th ]: CNN
[ Thu, Jun 19th ]: Forbes
[ Thu, Jun 19th ]: BBC
[ Thu, Jun 19th ]: WGME
[ Thu, Jun 19th ]: WYFF

[ Wed, Jun 18th ]: Fortune
[ Wed, Jun 18th ]: purewow
[ Wed, Jun 18th ]: Forbes
[ Wed, Jun 18th ]: Fortune
[ Wed, Jun 18th ]: Investopedia
[ Wed, Jun 18th ]: Investopedia
[ Wed, Jun 18th ]: Semafor
[ Wed, Jun 18th ]: GOBankingRates
[ Wed, Jun 18th ]: Forbes
[ Wed, Jun 18th ]: BBC
[ Wed, Jun 18th ]: Reuters

[ Tue, Jun 17th ]: Fortune
[ Tue, Jun 17th ]: AeroTime
[ Tue, Jun 17th ]: Fortune
[ Tue, Jun 17th ]: Fortune
[ Tue, Jun 17th ]: Fortune
[ Tue, Jun 17th ]: news4sanantonio
[ Tue, Jun 17th ]: Newsweek
[ Tue, Jun 17th ]: CNET
[ Tue, Jun 17th ]: ESPN
[ Tue, Jun 17th ]: Forbes
[ Tue, Jun 17th ]: Kotaku
[ Tue, Jun 17th ]: TSN
[ Tue, Jun 17th ]: CNET
[ Tue, Jun 17th ]: Forbes
[ Tue, Jun 17th ]: Impacts
[ Tue, Jun 17th ]: HuffPost
[ Tue, Jun 17th ]: Forbes
[ Tue, Jun 17th ]: MLive
[ Tue, Jun 17th ]: montanarightnow
[ Tue, Jun 17th ]: Insider
[ Tue, Jun 17th ]: WKRG
[ Tue, Jun 17th ]: WESH
[ Tue, Jun 17th ]: Forbes
[ Tue, Jun 17th ]: AFP

[ Mon, Jun 16th ]: Forbes
[ Mon, Jun 16th ]: NewsNation
[ Mon, Jun 16th ]: Parents
[ Mon, Jun 16th ]: Forbes
[ Mon, Jun 16th ]: Parade
[ Mon, Jun 16th ]: Fortune
[ Mon, Jun 16th ]: BBC
[ Mon, Jun 16th ]: Parade
[ Mon, Jun 16th ]: Fortune
[ Mon, Jun 16th ]: fox6now
[ Mon, Jun 16th ]: Forbes
[ Mon, Jun 16th ]: MassLive
[ Mon, Jun 16th ]: Euronews
[ Mon, Jun 16th ]: Fortune
[ Mon, Jun 16th ]: Forbes
[ Mon, Jun 16th ]: Fortune
[ Mon, Jun 16th ]: WMUR
[ Mon, Jun 16th ]: WHTM
[ Mon, Jun 16th ]: Newsweek
[ Mon, Jun 16th ]: Fortune
[ Mon, Jun 16th ]: Fortune
[ Mon, Jun 16th ]: Forbes
[ Mon, Jun 16th ]: WDRB

[ Sun, Jun 15th ]: ClutchPoints
[ Sun, Jun 15th ]: KXAN
Car park traveller plan rejected by council


🞛 This publication is a summary or evaluation of another publication 🞛 This publication contains editorial commentary or bias from the source
The authority opted to reject its own application after opposition from residents and councillors.

The proposal was put forward by Ashford Borough Council as a temporary solution to the ongoing issue of providing suitable accommodation for Travellers, a traditionally nomadic ethnic group in the UK. The plan involved converting a disused car park on the outskirts of the town into a site that could accommodate up to 12 Traveller families. The site would have included basic amenities such as water and electricity hookups, waste disposal facilities, and a small communal area.
The council argued that the car park was an ideal location for the temporary site due to its proximity to essential services and public transport links. They also emphasized that the plan was intended as a short-term measure while more permanent solutions were being developed. The council stated that they were committed to finding a long-term solution that would meet the needs of the Traveller community while also addressing the concerns of local residents.
However, the proposal faced significant opposition from local residents, businesses, and some councillors. Many argued that the car park was an inappropriate location for a Traveller site, citing concerns about increased traffic, noise, and potential anti-social behavior. Some residents expressed fears that the presence of Travellers would negatively impact property values in the area.
Local businesses also voiced their opposition to the plan, with some claiming that it would deter customers and harm their livelihoods. A petition against the proposal gathered thousands of signatures, reflecting the strength of feeling among the local community.
During the council meeting where the proposal was discussed, several councillors spoke out against the plan. They argued that the council should focus on finding a more suitable location for a permanent Traveller site rather than resorting to temporary measures. Some councillors also expressed concerns about the lack of consultation with local residents and businesses before the proposal was put forward.
In the end, the council voted to reject the proposal, with a majority of councillors siding with the concerns raised by the local community. The decision was met with relief by many residents and businesses, who felt that their voices had been heard. However, the rejection of the plan has left the council with the challenge of finding an alternative solution to accommodate the Traveller families currently in need of a place to stay.
The article also delves into the broader context of the Traveller community in the UK and the ongoing struggle to provide them with suitable accommodation. It highlights the fact that Travellers are a recognized ethnic minority group with a distinct culture and way of life. However, they often face discrimination and prejudice, which can make it difficult for them to find places to live and settle.
The article notes that the UK government has a legal obligation to provide sites for Travellers, but many local authorities struggle to find suitable locations that meet the needs of both the Traveller community and local residents. This has led to a shortage of authorized sites, forcing many Travellers to resort to unauthorized encampments, which can lead to tensions with local communities.
The article also discusses the challenges faced by local councils in balancing the rights and needs of Travellers with the concerns of their constituents. It highlights the fact that many councils face pressure from residents to prevent Traveller sites from being established in their areas, which can make it difficult to find suitable locations.
In the case of Ashford, the article suggests that the rejection of the car park proposal may lead to further delays in finding a solution for the Traveller families in need of accommodation. It notes that the council will now need to explore alternative options, which could include identifying other potential sites or working with neighboring authorities to find a solution.
The article also touches on the broader debate surrounding the rights of Travellers and the need for greater understanding and acceptance of their way of life. It suggests that more needs to be done to educate the public about the Traveller community and to challenge the stereotypes and prejudices that often surround them.
In conclusion, the article provides a detailed account of the controversial proposal to convert a car park in Ashford into a temporary Traveller site and the subsequent rejection of the plan by the local council. It highlights the complex challenges faced by local authorities in providing suitable accommodation for Travellers while also addressing the concerns of local residents and businesses. The article also sheds light on the broader issues surrounding the Traveller community in the UK and the need for greater understanding and acceptance of their way of life.
Read the Full BBC Article at:
[ https://www.aol.com/news/car-park-traveller-plan-rejected-095456907.html ]
Publication Contributing Sources