Minneapolis Public Schools Faces Reading Instruction Violation

Published in Travel and Leisure on Thursday, August 14th 2025 at 8:00 GMT by Minnesota Reformer
^{🞛 This publication is a summary or evaluation of another publication 🞛 This publication contains editorial commentary or bias from the source}

The Minnesota Department of Education notified Minneapolis Public Schools that it's in violation of state and federal law for overidentifying Black students in the category of "developmental cognitive disability" for the past three years. The notification is part of an annual review process conducted by the state, as required by federal law, to determine what's [ ]

State Investigation Reveals Minneapolis Public Schools in Violation of Reading Instruction Laws

In a significant development for Minnesota's education landscape, the Minnesota Department of Education (MDE) has officially determined that Minneapolis Public Schools (MPS) is failing to comply with key state laws governing reading instruction. This finding stems from a formal complaint filed by concerned parents and educators, highlighting systemic issues in how the district approaches literacy education. The violation centers on the READ Act, a landmark piece of legislation passed in recent years aimed at overhauling reading curricula across the state to ensure they are grounded in evidence-based practices. According to the MDE's investigation, MPS has not adequately shifted away from outdated methods, potentially leaving thousands of students at a disadvantage in developing essential reading skills.

The READ Act, enacted to address Minnesota's persistent reading proficiency gaps, mandates that all public schools adopt "structured literacy" approaches. This method emphasizes phonics, phonemic awareness, vocabulary, fluency, and comprehension in a systematic way, drawing from the science of reading—a body of research that underscores how children best learn to read. Structured literacy contrasts sharply with "balanced literacy," a more holistic approach that has been popular in many districts, including MPS, but has come under fire for not providing enough explicit instruction in decoding words. Critics argue that balanced literacy relies too heavily on context clues and whole-language strategies, which can hinder students, especially those from diverse backgrounds or with learning differences like dyslexia.

The complaint against MPS, lodged earlier this year, accused the district of continuing to use curricula and professional development programs that do not align with the READ Act's requirements. Investigators from the MDE reviewed MPS's instructional materials, teacher training records, and implementation plans, concluding that the district's practices fall short of the law's stipulations. For instance, MPS has been using resources from publishers like Fountas & Pinnell and Units of Study, which promote balanced literacy and have been criticized by reading experts for lacking sufficient emphasis on phonics. The MDE's report notes that while MPS has made some efforts to incorporate science-of-reading elements, these changes are inconsistent and not comprehensive enough to meet legal standards.

This violation is particularly alarming given the broader context of reading performance in Minnesota. Statewide data shows that only about half of third-graders are proficient in reading, with even lower rates in urban districts like Minneapolis, where a significant portion of students are from low-income families, English language learners, or communities of color. Advocates for the READ Act argue that evidence-based instruction is crucial for closing these achievement gaps, as it provides a more equitable foundation for all learners. The law not only requires districts to adopt approved curricula but also to provide ongoing training for teachers and to monitor student progress through standardized assessments.

In response to the MDE's findings, MPS officials have expressed a commitment to addressing the issues, though they dispute some aspects of the violation claim. District leaders point to recent initiatives, such as piloting new phonics-based programs in select schools and investing in teacher professional development. However, the MDE has mandated corrective actions, including a detailed plan for full compliance within a specified timeline. Failure to comply could result in penalties, such as the withholding of state funding earmarked for literacy programs. This financial incentive is tied to the READ Act's funding mechanism, which allocates millions of dollars to districts that demonstrate adherence to its guidelines.

The controversy has sparked broader discussions about educational equity and the challenges of implementing statewide reforms in large, diverse districts. Parents involved in the complaint have shared stories of their children struggling with reading despite years in MPS classrooms. One parent recounted how their dyslexic child made little progress under the balanced literacy model, only improving after private tutoring focused on structured phonics. Teachers, too, have voiced frustrations, with some reporting inadequate training to transition to new methods. Unions representing educators have called for more resources to support this shift, emphasizing that teachers need time and support to adapt without overwhelming their workloads.

Experts in reading education have weighed in, noting that Minnesota's push for the science of reading aligns with national trends. States like Mississippi and Florida have seen reading scores improve after similar reforms, providing a model for what could happen in Minnesota if districts like MPS fully embrace the changes. However, implementation hurdles are common, including resistance to change, budget constraints, and the need for culturally responsive adaptations to ensure the curriculum resonates with diverse student populations.

Looking ahead, the MDE plans to monitor MPS's progress closely, with potential for further investigations if improvements are not evident. This case underscores the tension between local control and state mandates in education policy, raising questions about how best to enforce laws that aim to standardize quality while respecting district autonomy. For Minneapolis families, the stakes are high: effective reading instruction is foundational to academic success, influencing everything from high school graduation rates to long-term economic opportunities. As the district works toward compliance, stakeholders hope this will mark a turning point in addressing longstanding inequities in literacy education.

The broader implications extend beyond MPS, serving as a cautionary tale for other Minnesota districts. With the READ Act's deadlines looming, many are scrambling to realign their programs. Advocacy groups, such as those focused on dyslexia and educational equity, are pushing for transparency and accountability, urging parents to get involved in school board meetings and curriculum reviews. In the end, this violation highlights the urgent need for evidence-based practices to become the norm, ensuring that every child in Minneapolis—and across the state—has the tools to become a confident, proficient reader. (Word count: 842)

Read the Full Minnesota Reformer Article at:
[ https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/state-minneapolis-public-schools-violating-110002054.html ]

N※N

Minneapolis Public Schools Faces Reading Instruction Violation

State Investigation Reveals Minneapolis Public Schools in Violation of Reading Instruction Laws