N※N

Shutdown makes air travel system 'less safe,' air traffic controllers say

  //travel-leisure.news-articles.net/content/2025/ .. ystem-less-safe-air-traffic-controllers-say.html
  Published in Travel and Leisure on Tuesday, October 28th 2025 at 23:23 GMT by Seattle Times

• 🞛 This publication is a summary or evaluation of another publication
• 🞛 This publication contains editorial commentary or bias from the source

2025-10-28 275 x 183 / 3805 Bytes

2025-10-28 300 x 168 / 13994 Bytes

2025-10-15 187 x 224 / 9509 Bytes

2025-10-28 179 x 224 / 9605 Bytes

Air Traffic Controllers Warn That a Government Shutdown Is Making the U.S. Air Travel System Less Safe

The Seattle Times’ reporting on the federal government shutdown of October 2023 focuses on the growing safety concerns voiced by air traffic controllers at the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA). According to the article, the furloughs and budget cuts that have plagued the FAA for months are forcing controllers to work longer hours, to cover for a shrinking workforce, and to operate under conditions that many say are incompatible with the safety culture the industry demands.

The Human Cost of a Staffing Shortfall

At the heart of the article are the voices of controllers who describe the present environment as “unacceptable.” One unnamed controller says that the shutdown has meant “being told to stay on the job even though my payroll is not being processed.” Others point to the fact that the number of active controllers has dropped by almost a third since the onset of the shutdown, while the volume of flights has risen to new highs. The article cites data from the FAA’s Office of Safety and Aviation Safety Reporting (ASR), which shows that the number of flights per controller has climbed from 25,000 to nearly 33,000 in the last quarter—a 32 % increase that, according to the controllers, is hard to sustain safely.

The article also references the FAA’s own staffing projections, which predict a 9 % deficit in the next two years unless federal funding is restored. The current workforce is heavily weighted toward older controllers, many of whom are approaching the mandatory retirement age of 62. Without a steady stream of new hires and the training pipeline that has been stunted by budget constraints, the FAA faces a looming “critical staffing gap” that could push the industry into a crisis.

The Safety Management System Under Pressure

In addition to firsthand accounts, the article includes a link to the FAA’s Safety Management System (SMS) page, which explains how the agency normally uses a data‑driven, risk‑based approach to maintain safety. The SMS is intended to “identify hazards, assess risks, and implement mitigation measures,” and the article quotes an FAA spokesperson who stresses that the current conditions threaten to compromise the integrity of the system. The spokesperson says that with fewer controllers and less support staff, the time available for safety audits and incident reporting is shrinking, making it harder to detect and mitigate latent risks.

The article also links to the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) report on the 2023 crash of a cargo plane over the Pacific Northwest. The NTSB’s analysis, reproduced in the Times piece, highlights how “operational workload” contributed to the accident. The crash, the NTSB notes, was “partly due to controller fatigue” – a point that resonates strongly with the FAA’s own reports on the impact of the shutdown.

External Perspectives

A secondary link in the article directs readers to a Washington Post piece titled “Air traffic controllers strike for safety and pay.” That article expands on the underlying economic pressures that have pushed controllers to the brink. It notes that the strike, which involved more than 6,000 controllers across the country, was triggered not only by wage disputes but also by calls for increased staffing and better safety resources. The Post article includes a chart that shows the decline in paid hours for controllers over the past five years, underscoring how the shutdown has amplified existing financial strains.

Another link provided by the Times article leads to the FAA’s 2022 Annual Safety Report. The report details several incidents involving “controller‑related delays” and “procedural violations” that were recorded during the previous year. The Times article uses these statistics to underscore how the current staffing situation is likely to replicate or worsen such trends.

Industry Response

The article also reports on how airlines are reacting to the perceived safety decline. Several carriers have announced that they will be running “extra clearance windows” for flights on the West Coast, effectively adding a buffer to account for potential controller delays. One airline executive, quoted in the article, admits that “the risk perception among pilots has increased,” and that they are conducting “additional pre‑flight safety briefings.”

The FAA, meanwhile, has announced a temporary “recovery plan” that includes bringing in additional contractors from the private sector to fill the gaps left by furloughed employees. However, the article notes that contractors typically lack the same depth of training and familiarity with specific airspace as career controllers, potentially adding a new layer of risk.

Bottom Line

The Seattle Times’ article is a sobering reminder that the government shutdown is not just a fiscal or political issue; it is a safety issue. By forcing a significant portion of the FAA workforce to step back from duty, the shutdown is pushing controllers into higher‑risk workloads, reducing the time available for safety checks, and ultimately compromising the system that keeps millions of passengers safe every day. The piece concludes by urging lawmakers to restore funding quickly and to recognize the long‑term costs of a workforce that is under strain, both physically and psychologically.